From: Fetterman, Pat [Glen.Fetterman@Infineum.com]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 4:50 PM
To: Allison Rajakumar; a.budd@isp-institute.com; Bill Buscher (E-mail); Bill Larch; Boese, Doyle; Brad Carter; Campbell, Bob; Cathy Devlin; charlie.passut@aftonchemical.com; Chris Castanian; Dan Pridemore; Glen Fetterman; Greg Miiller; greg.shank@volvo.com; Hind Abi-Akar; James Gutzwiller; James Matasic (E-mail); Jeff Clark; Jesse Hamilton; jecarter@dow.com; Jim McGeehan; jim.moritz@intertek.com; Jim Rutherford; Jim Wells; JingChun Xie; joe.franklin@intertek.com; John Haegelin; Keith Selby; kenneth.goshorn@volvo.com; Kevin Carabell; Marc Peters; Mark Cooper; Matt Urbanak (E-mail); Mike Alessi; Norbert Nann (E-mail); Riccardo Conti; Rich Grundza; Ron Buck; Ryan Johnson; Scott Harold; Scott Richards (E-mail); Shawn Whitacre; Steve Kennedy; Tom Wingfield; Victor Kersey; WenTong Lu; Wim Van Dam; Zack Bishop
Cc: ronald.brock@us.mahle.com; eric.garzelloni@us.mahle.com
Subject: Unconfirmed minutes of our January 14, 2011 teleconference.

Participants –

Zack Bishop; Ron Brock; Bob Campbell; Kevin Carabell; Brad Carter; Mark Cooper; Chris Castanien; Jeff Clark; Riccardo Conti; Pat Fetterman; Eric Garzelloni; Ken Goshorn; Jim Gutzwiller; Jim Matasic; Jim Moritz; Scott Richards; Jim Rutherford; Greg Shank; Brad Toole; Tom Wingfield

 

Discussion –

Mark Cooper started by asking Volvo Powertrain for an update on the design criteria of the E7 connecting rods. Greg Shank replied that the data does not exist, but Ken Goshorn observed that for years these rods had been run in internal tests at 3200 psi firing pressure with no bearing cracking. He also noted that in field service they have never run beyond 2700 psi. Ken also clarified that a two dimple rod has not necessarily been re-maned twice. It simply means that it fits in group II which is up to 0.010 inches shorter than print.

A discussion regarding rod bolts suggests that there may have been a change in supplier, and Ken agreed to check that out. However, he also noted that there has been no indication that the bearings are moving in the bore, and he doesn’t think there is a bolt problem.

Jim Mortiz reviewed data showing that at least one bearing from batch V seems to have a significant scratch on the outside, and he reviewed Ra and PDI data showing an Ra of 137 with the groove and 80-90 without the groove. These measurements are well beyond the Mahle spec of 63 max on the flat stock.

This led to a lengthy discussion regarding Mahle’s ability to control backside roughness to a lower level. It was concluded that their manufacturing cannot control to a lower limit, but it may be possible to inspect for “smoother” bearing backs.

During another lengthy discussion regarding how to get “smoother” backed bearings, Mahle indicated that these bearings are routinely run in monthly batches of 4 to 5K units for Mack Service, and we discussed whether it might be possible to “intercept” some of these bearings and screen them for possible T-12 test usage. Bob Campbell noted that he thinks the batch V bearings may well be the exception to standard “smooth” back bearings, and it may well be possible to use service parts as long as they are picked from a single batch.

Throughout the call, the Mahle representatives were in contact with their plant; and they reported that, in fact, the plant is currently running a batch of bearings for Mack Service. Eric Garzelloni indicated that they should know later today how many bearings are being produced and at what stage of production the order is in.

Tentative plans to “look” at these bearings and see how they compare to our desired “smooth” back were discussed, and we agreed to hold another conference call next week to review whatever additional data is available by then.

That call is planned for 2:30 pm EST on Wednesday, January 19th, and Greg Shank suggested that we postpone our planned face to face meeting which had been planned for the 25th.

Jim Moritz and Mark Cooper will work together to set up a date for joint meetings of the Mack and Cummins Surveillance Panels.

Jim Moritz will send the “bad” bearing to Mahle to be used as a sample of the type of backside roughness we want to avoid.

Tom Wingfield suggested that Mahle could look at the measured backside roughness on the 1/10 dated bearings to see if, perhaps, they may have run at the high end of allowable roughness. Eric Garzelloni agreed to look, but he doesn’t know how much data is available.

Again, next teleconference is planned for 2:30 pm on January 19th, and joint meetings of the Mack and Cummins Panels will be held at the call of their Chairs.

Respectfully submitted,

Pat